for osama bin laden and

for osama bin laden and. Osama Bin Laden addressing
  • Osama Bin Laden addressing



  • smugDrew
    May 3, 07:54 AM
    *cough* TFT Panels?!! Didn't iMac's always have an IPS Panel?





    for osama bin laden and. of Osama in Laden and his.
  • of Osama in Laden and his.



  • Teddy's
    Aug 15, 01:31 PM
    Still... meh.
    oh... come on! :mad:





    for osama bin laden and. Osama bin Laden
  • Osama bin Laden



  • ScottishDuck
    Apr 15, 04:10 PM
    OSX was built on UNIX. Just like Android is built in Linux.

    I did make an off the cuff statement about ChromeOS. But my reasoning was that OSX is a little bit more than ChromeOS, so rolling it out and making it available is a little different.

    OSX was not built on UNIX, it is Mach/XNU with a BSD subsystem, it is UNIX-like, much like linux.

    OSX and Chrome OS are on par, both are heavily modified versions of an open-source operating system, with extensive APIs to make them more user friendly.





    for osama bin laden and. for Osama Bin Laden and. usama
  • for Osama Bin Laden and. usama



  • Eriden
    Mar 16, 07:54 AM
    Wool first...In line at Brea. 6 people here total.

    Ni shi zhong guo ren ma?

    If so, I'm in line at Brea as well. Hard to believe that we managed to get in as early as we did.





    for osama bin laden and. led by Osama Bin Laden.
  • led by Osama Bin Laden.



  • kiljoy616
    Apr 21, 11:27 PM
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v1PBptSDIh8

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T3n0vBcW5fc&feature=related :D





    for osama bin laden and. Osama Bin Laden and Saddam.
  • Osama Bin Laden and Saddam.



  • bushman4
    Apr 26, 10:55 PM
    As much as I wish it would happen, I doubt Apple has fully internalized that the glossy glass screens were a horrendous design decision. I bet is it'll be two more years until they will be forever phased out, along with the enormous black bezels on the majority of products. But Apple is typically slow in realizing their mistakes, no surprise given their successes.

    Point well taken. You're probably right but i'm still hoping that they at least cut down that huge bezel. Also I would hope that they make that SSD standard.





    for osama bin laden and. osama bin laden and bush.
  • osama bin laden and bush.



  • bluebomberman
    Jul 12, 08:44 PM
    Yep, yep, I figured that bit out. I was looking for the flexible page/quadrant stuff - to print in "booklet" form, for example. It aint in Word for Mac.

    My recollection is that Word for Windows doesn't have it either. I have no way to verify that right now, though, since I don't have a Windows computer here on the premises.

    If you're willing to suck it up and go to a copy shop, though, then it's a moot point; you can just design it as a normal document and have them bind it on double-sized paper. (Example: they can fold 11" x 17" sheets into a 8.5" x 11" booklet.)





    for osama bin laden and. and that Osama bin Laden
  • and that Osama bin Laden



  • Steve121178
    Apr 12, 10:13 AM
    Enjoy the version of Android that comes on that thing out of the box. With all the HTC bloatware and Android fragmentation you'll be lucky to ever see a software update. :rolleyes:

    HTC phones get updates & always have done. What is this HTC bloatware you are talking about? If you mean HTC Sense I'll laugh at you a lot. It's a brilliant add-on to Android. In fact, I couldn't imagine Android without it.





    for osama bin laden and. Osama bin Ladin and say,
  • Osama bin Ladin and say,



  • Benjy91
    Apr 29, 02:47 PM
    Oooh things are heating up :D

    I'm not gonna buy music from Amazon again though, I downloaded 1 song for my Dad once from there. Because iTunes didn't have it, and Amazon emailed me for weeks with spam.





    for osama bin laden and. osama bin laden and hitler.
  • osama bin laden and hitler.



  • charliepratt
    Apr 14, 04:14 PM
    In Charlotte, NC. In the midst of AT&T upgrades.. Looks groovy to me.





    for osama bin laden and. Bin Laden was killed during a
  • Bin Laden was killed during a



  • zipster
    May 4, 12:30 PM
    I'm not even mad. I love my (jailbroken) iPhone 4.

    I just wish the white came out a year ago.





    for osama bin laden and. Osama bin Laden DEAD (AKA
  • Osama bin Laden DEAD (AKA



  • Paul Graham
    Jan 26, 07:05 AM
    Really? I took the cue from the post count and not page count. I was under the impression that graphic-heavy threads are closed after about 2000 posts.

    Agreed, I love the elements drives. I have two that I've stacked and used spacers to keep them from actually touching. I'd like to get another as they're attached to my mac mini that I use as an HTPC.

    Cool, Yeh I want to stack mine aswell once i get my emac set up. Got any pics of the drives with spacers?





    for osama bin laden and. hopes Osama bin Laden#39;s
  • hopes Osama bin Laden#39;s



  • peskaa
    Nov 1, 11:43 AM
    Canon 200mm f/2?

    Me too.

    Looks more like the 300mm f/2.8L. The IS switches are in the wrong locations for the 200 f/2L.

    </nerd>





    for osama bin laden and. Osama bin Laden#39;s death is
  • Osama bin Laden#39;s death is



  • Vizin
    Apr 25, 11:33 PM
    Same thing apple always does function not features.

    LTE is a pretty fantastic function. Using 4G on my friend's Thunderbolt feels the same as using WiFi. The battery life is unacceptable though.

    If Apple can't get LTE working in time for the iPhone 5 (not really in their hands), I seriously hope to see HSPA+ as a stop-gap.





    for osama bin laden and. osama bin laden taliban. in
  • osama bin laden taliban. in



  • SeanZy
    Mar 12, 10:43 AM
    really sorry to hear that. reading about the insanely long lines at the apple store in brea, i headed over to best buy in fullerton instead. arrived at 1p and was 13th or so in line. i wish you all the luck in getting an ipad soon.



    and i find that really surprising. despite at&t's faster (when available) data speeds, i've always found coverage to be completely spotty, especially in fullerton and brea. opted for a verizon ipad.

    Nice I was 4th in line at the fullerton best buy. I was so happy best buy had enough





    for osama bin laden and. for Osama Bin Laden and.
  • for Osama Bin Laden and.



  • stunna
    Jul 25, 11:21 PM
    I just want to know the price
    I"m sure these can be built but can the average teen afford one?





    for osama bin laden and. killed Osama Bin Laden and
  • killed Osama Bin Laden and



  • cmaier
    Apr 22, 12:35 PM
    Wait what ? Apple's complaint had multiple utility patents, design patents, trademark infringement claims and trade dress claims. That's pretty broad, not specific.

    No, there were many specific allegation (for example the patent claims), and many others (trade dress) aimed at a broader range of devices. And for the claims that don't require pleading with great specificity, they did give examples.





    for osama bin laden and. of Osama Bin Laden and the.
  • of Osama Bin Laden and the.



  • bobnugget
    Apr 14, 04:14 AM
    My crazy guess is:

    iX = iTunes X (not iTunes 10) for Mac, which uses similar software to the iOS Simulator to run your iOS apps on your new (touchscreen?) mac.





    for osama bin laden and. Then and now: Osama Bin Laden,
  • Then and now: Osama Bin Laden,



  • KoukiFC3S
    Mar 16, 01:28 AM
    Had no luck today. I'll be going back Thursday.





    ZiggyZidel
    Mar 31, 10:54 AM
    This is hideous.Hopefully there are custom settings because this is definitely
    a step backwards design wise to me.

    Also, it is definitely. time for them to inegrate Facetime and iChat





    FarFromSubtle
    May 3, 08:09 AM
    4-6 weeks for an SSD upgrade?!?!

    Steve jobs: "umad?"

    Looks like another month of waiting for me!





    MagnusVonMagnum
    Nov 20, 10:40 AM
    If you don't address those very good reasons, your argument won't be very convincing. We do not want the CPU suck, the identity leaking, the UI inconsistencies, and the very real risk of "zero day" Adobe bugs.

    Whom am I trying to convince? Illogical and irrational people who worship Steve Jobs and hate what he hates? Such people will not care or listen to any form of reason. That's why the word fanatic is in fanboy. No, I talk about an option to turn Flash on or off at will and you find it offensive to even offer an option. That is irrational at best.

    Everything you fear would be avoided if someone just turned Flash OFF (or it could default to off and have to be turned on). I've said since the first post the word OPTION. You don't seem to comprehend that word or understand why those of us that would want the choice of having Flash are not asking you to give up anything in the process. You could always turn it off if it were present. We cannot turn it on if it's not present.


    In other words, you are not competent to carry on a rational discussion. You're just here to vent.


    No, I just don't see any point in trying to carry on a logical, rational discussion with someone whose "argument" is based purely on emotion. If it weren't, you wouldn't object to an option for those of us that don't agree with Steve Jobs point of view because an option satisfies all your arguments against having Flash because you can always just leave it OFF. It cannot do harm if it's off no matter how paranoid you may become about having it on your device.

    Many millions of people have Flash installed on their Macs (let alone those using Windows and Linux) and they could remove it. They know that if they do, some web sites will cease to function properly and thus they leave it on. The security concerns you mentioned will be addressed as all security bugs are in both OSX and Windows.


    Users of those 120M+ devices don't have to hope. They are already free of Flash!


    Free of Flash? You say that in a tone that sounds like they're free of slavery or something. No, what they're free of is the ability to access millions of web sites that require Flash to view them or much of their content and I do not see that as a good thing. But my point of view doesn't require you to see it. I said from the first post I wanted an option to use Flash. You could still choose to turn it off if it were there. I cannot turn on what is not present nor should I have to buy some absurd 3rd party converter that requires their web site to be running to use it.


    The analogy makes no sense. Nobody is forcing you to use any Apple product.


    And so that makes it OK for him to behave as he does? A lot of us like Apple products, but we would like them a lot better if Steve would just stick to making the products unfettered instead of trying to force his opinions and world view on people in the process. He doesn't like Flash so he decides for everyone they should not use Flash. What if Steve decided iOS shall no longer support MP3 files, only AAC? I suppose you would accept that as OK too? Update iOS and your MP3s no longer function. Yes, that would be just wonderful if they did that. After all, AAC is superior to MP3, so why should Apple support a legacy inferior heavily pirated format? By your logic, they should not.


    If you really want the "full web experience" of zero-day Adobe bugs, get an Android phone. Note: Android phones were vulnerable to the last zero-day Adobe bug. (http://www.grc.com/sn/sn-273.txt)


    I don't want a phone period guy. I only want and use an iPod Touch. Is there an Android iPod Touch? Android didn't exist when Apple made the claims of accessing the full Internet either and it doesn't make that any less a lie.


    The fact that I can't catch zero-day Adobe attacks on my iPhone is a great reason to praise Apple's decision.


    You act as if Apple has no vulnerabilities to attack. That is extremely naive to the point of emotionalism once again. In fact it's just the opposite. Apple's security is rated as bad compared to Windows and only the fact that there are so few Mac users compared to Windows has saved it thus far. As the popularity of iOS devices has exploded, it's inevitable that it will start attracting malware. It's only a matter of time. Will you wish you never bought an iPhone on that day or will you recognize that companies simply have to find and patch vulnerabilities. Apple has patched numerous security flaws in OSX over the years. Should we plug our ears and say there is no such thing?


    Do tell: what exact sites are you talking about? What exact legacy flash applications are running on those sites to which you can find no substitute?


    A quick search (you do know how to do that don't you?) reveals offhand a few example sites that don't use HTML5 video (which could and may in the future, but that doesn't help someone today):

    Gametrailers
    GiantBomb
    Vimeo
    Playstation Blog
    Stiq of Joy
    Engadget

    Try some of these effects on this site this with HTML5:

    http://superior-web-solutions.com/

    Maybe read this article on Flash. Most HTML5 is just a video player. Flash isn't just a video player and it didn't even start as one.

    http://www.andrewgreig.com/2010/06/html5-is-not-a-flash-replacement-and-shouldnt-be-seen-that-way/

    Perhaps you want an open standard? So when does Apple stop requiring Quicktime on their web sites? :rolleyes:


    Nobody is holding a gun to your head. Nobody is holding you hostage.

    If you don't like the choices that Apple made, then ditch your iOS device and get an Android. Simple.


    No, they're just boring me to death with emotional arguments why everyone should either worship Steve Jobs or leave the platform and get an Android instead similar to the "love OSX or leave it" arguments the fanboys regularly produce.


    This is the first little lie in your rant. The iOS users don't find it inconvenient. If Flash were so damn important to them, they would have bought some device that could run Flash.


    The fact that you think my statement is a "lie" based on a subjective opinion tells me you cannot even tell fact from fiction let alone lies from opinions. Trying to see someone else's point of view is completely foreign to you. You view the world through tinted lenses. What you say is akin to if you don't like something about OSX, go buy a Windows machine, as if there aren't any compromises along the way on that platform either (not to mention having to replace possibly thousands and thousands of dollars worth of software for a given platform to do so). Not liking something about a given platform and wanting to change it doesn't mean another platform is more viable in ALL areas or that a person may wish to spend a lot of money to make that change just because of that one issue. Perhaps you'd like to send me a free Android phone to replace my aging 1st Gen iPod Touch that I bought before Android even existed? I'd happily consider such an offer. Of course I'll need replacement apps as well.


    The people who bought those 120M+ devices disagree with you.


    You seem to forge that I and others that actually want Flash are part of those people dude. Get over yourself. Just because you don't like Flash doesn't mean the rest of us have hatred for it. Some of us simply don't like our iPhones, iPads and iPod Touches crippled for no reason. Besides, how you try to turn my initial argument that I'd prefer to see an option to use Flash for those of us that want it rather than no option into this flipping crusade against all things Apple and Flash alike is beyond me. You are making mountains out of mole hills and lies out of opinions. For what? I can't make you see things the way I see them. I never wanted to try. That's why I said OPTION. But you would deny everyone who wants that option to have it just like Steve Jobs. Steve does it because he's a control freak (he was once ousted from Apple for this very reason). I imagine you do it because you love Apple. Sadly, I actually prefer Steve's reason.


    This is the second little lie. Apple did provide a choice: they approved the SkyFire App. They didn't have to do that.


    Didn't they? It doesn't violate their rules for an app so how could they not approve it without being outright liars? Oh wait. They have done that before so I can see your point. ;)


    Apple has also announced they will approve Flash Apps using Adobe's cross-compiler for iOS. If there actually are crucial Flash apps -- you haven't named a single specific one so far -- the owners of those apps should be able to easily cross-compile their apps for the iOS App Store.


    Apple formerly announced they would NOT support it. Why did they change their minds? Could it have something to do with the Justice Department starting an investigation into anti-trust behaviors by Apple policies? Noooo....it couldn't be that. Apple is allowed to single out companies it doesn't like and compete with to just willy-nilly throw specifically into their license agreements.


    And that is the third little lie. Flash is a proprietary and legacy platform. It's on the way down now.


    I say if you don't have Flash you don't have the full Internet and you call that a "lie" based on the above quote? What freaking UNIVERSE do you live in??????? ROTFLMAO. You cannot tell a statement of fact from an idea in your head that somehow says that the "full internet" doesn't include sites that use "propriety" formats. Come on man. That position not only ignore reality it even invalidiates Apple's own web site as being part of the "full Internet" !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    You need to try harder. Calling someone a liar when they are obviously stating facts and/or opinions just makes you look immature.

    because accusing someone of lying when it's obvious
    Even Adobe has acknowledged that a Flash-only choice is a bankrupt strategy (http://forums.macrumors.com/showthread.php?t=1039999). After websites start offering their content with an open standard, you've gotta ask: what exactly is the value in continuing to prop up Flash?


    First of all, you are the one that is calling it a "bankrupt strategy". I see nothing in that thread by Adobe that even addresses the matter. Adobe is simply trying to sell products and if they can easily sell more products to Apple users by providing an easy way to convert their hard work Flash sites into HTML5, they are going to do so and laugh all the way to the bank. That in NO WAY invalidates the fact that there are still plenty of Flash only sites out there and plenty of flash uses (e.g. Flash games) that HTML5 is no simple substitute for regardless. Until the Internet is Flash free, there is going to be a need and a will by people to have the option to view Flash.

    The mere fact that this Skyfire app has raked in over $1 MILLION in sales already shows just how big that will is. Yet you reject the desire to be able to use Flash web sites as meaningless and unnecessary while the thread title alone proves you wrong.





    ChrisTX
    Apr 22, 08:08 PM
    I don't like this wedge fetish Apple is on. Tell me this thing will look better when I sober up. :eek:

    I'm sober and it's not looking all that good from my end. :-/





    sprtnbsblplya
    Sep 17, 08:04 PM
    Picked this up at Georgetown University's bookstore today, they had it beside the new models and it was marked down to $27 brand new.

    http://i146.photobucket.com/albums/r269/loykastj/20100917-IMG_3076.jpg




    Total Pageviews